Effectiveness of Disinfection with 70% Isopropyl Alcohol to Reduce Bacterial Contamination of Mobile Phones Carried by Medical Personnel in Baghdad Teaching Hospital
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59746/jfms.v1i1.87Keywords:
70% alcohol, mobile phones, disinfection, bacterial contaminationAbstract
Mobile phones, despite their importance in daily life, can disseminate pathogens due to their frequent contact with hands. The purpose of the present study is to determine the prevalence of bacterial contamination on the mobile phones of healthcare personnel at the Baghdad Teaching Hospital, to identify the contaminating microorganisms, and to determine the preventive efficacy of 70% isopropyl alcohol. Sixty mobile phones from 40 physicians and 20 nurses were analyzed for microbial contamination. After collecting samples from each phone, they were disinfected with 70% isopropyl alcohol wipes and samples were recollected. Twenty four hours of aerobic and anaerobic incubation of agar plates at 37 °C. The results indicated that 34 (56.7%) out of 60 samples were contaminated with bacteria. Approximately 57.5% of the mobile phones used by physicians and 45% of those used by nurses contained microorganisms. Before disinfection, the most common bacteria found in mobile phones were coagulase-negative staphylococci, followed by Staphylococcus aureus, hemolytic (3.33%) and non-hemolytic (3.33%) Streptococci. While, E. coli and fungi contaminates were also found on mobile phone surfaces in equal percentage (6.67%). Following disinfection with 70% isopropyl alcohol, the number of bacteria was reduced to nil in 83.3% of the colonized mobile phones. This investigation demonstrated that commercially available, affordable and device safe wipes containing 70% isopropyl alcohol can significantly reduce mobile phone contamination. As a result, it is crucial for medical professionals to sterilize their mobile phones on a regular basis, as this can limit the dissemination of pathogens to patients and reduce the incidence of hospital acquired infections.
References
• Hacek DM, Suriano T, Noskin GA, Kruszynski J, Reisberg B and Peterson LR. 1999. Medical and economic benefit of a comprehensive infection control program that includes routine determination of microbial clonality. Am. J. Clin. Pathol.; 111(5): 647-654. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/111.5.647
• Hassan AN, Birt DM and Frank JF. 2004. Behavior of Listeria monocytogenes in a Pseudomonas putida biofilm on a condensate-forming surface. J. Food Prot.; 67(2): 322-327. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-67.2.322.
• Kilic IH, Ozaslan M, Karagoz ID, Zer Y and Davutoglu V. 2009. The microbial colonisation of mobile phone used by healthcare staffs. Pak. J. Biol. Sci.; 12(11): 882. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2009.882.884.
• Kolmos HJ. 2007. Hospital infections: sources and routes of infection. Ugeskrift for laeger.; 169(48): 4138-4142. http://ugeskriftet.dk/videnskab/hospitalsinfektioner-aktuelle-smittekilder-og-smittevejeAccessed August 7,2019.
• Koscova J, Hurnikova Z and Pistl J. 2018. Degree of bacterial contamination of mobile phone and computer keyboard surfaces and efficacy of disinfection with chlorhexidine digluconate and triclosan to its reduction. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health.; 15(10): 2238. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15102238.
• Mermel LA, Allon M, Bouza E, Craven DE, Flynn P, O'Grady NP, Raad II, Rijnders BJ, Sherertz, RJ and Warren DK. 2009. Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intravascular catheter-related infection: 2009 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis.;49(1):1-45. https://doi.org/10.1086/599376
• Murgier J, Coste JF, Cavaignac E, Bayle-Iniguez X, Chiron P, Bonnevialle P and Laffosse JM. 2016. Microbial flora on cell-phones in an orthopedic surgery room before and after decontamination. Orthop Traumatol-Sur.; 102(8): 1093- 1096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2016.09.014
• Pal S, Juyal D, Adekhandi S, Sharma M, Prakash R, Sharma N, Rana A and Parihar A. 2015. Mobile phones: Reservoirs for the transmission of nosocomial pathogens. Adv. Biomed. Res.; 4.https://doi.org/10.4103/2277-9175.161553
• Palaniswamy U, Habeeb, A and Mohsin M. 2018. Efficacy of titanium dioxide nanoparticle spray to disinfect mobile phones used by endodontist: A bacteriological study. J. Conserv. Dent.;21(2):226. https://doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_236_17
• Plowman R, Graves N, Griffin MAS, Roberts JA, Swan AV, Cookson B and Taylor L. 2011. The rate and cost of hospital-acquired infections occurring in patients admitted to selected specialties of a district general hospital in England and the national burden imposed. J. Hosp. Infect.;47(3):198-209.https://doi.org/10.1053/jhin.2000.0881
• Rahangdale V, Kokate S, Surpam R. 2014. Cell phones- homes for microbes. IOSR J Dent Med Sci.;13:97-100. https://doi.org/10.9790/0853-1312597100
• Ribeiro MM, Neumann VA, Padoveze MC and Graziano KU. 2015. Efficacy and effectiveness of alcohol in the disinfection of semi-critical materials: a systematic review. Rev. Lat.-Am. Enferm.;23(4):741-752.https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-1169.0266.2611
• Rutala WA and Weber DJ. 2008. Guideline for disinfection and sterilization in healthcare facilities". Available: https://www.cdc.gov/infectioncontrol/guidelines/disinfection/ Accessed September 5, 2019
• Sepehri G, Talebizadeh N, Mirzazadeh A, Mir-shekari TR and Sepehri E. 2009. Bacterial contamination and resistance to commonly used antimicrobials of healthcare workers' mobile phones in teaching hospitals, Kerman, Iran. Am. J. Appl. Sci.; 6(5): 806. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2009.806.810
• Shakir IA, Patel NH, Chamberland RR and Kaar SG. 2015. Investigation of cell phones as a potential source of bacterial contamination in the operating room. J Bone Joint Surg Am.; 97(3): 225-231.https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.N.00523 PMid:25653323
• Singh A and Purohit B. 2012. Mobile phones in hospital settings: a serious threat to infection. Occup.Health Safety (Waco, Tex.).; 81(3): pp.42-44. http://worldcat.org/issn/03624064Accessed August 6,2019.
• Singh S, Acharya S, Bhat M, Rao, SK and Pentapati KC. 2010. Mobile phone hygiene: potential risks posed by use in the clinics of an Indian dental school. J. Dent. Educ.;74(10): 1153-1158. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2010.74.10.tb04971.x
• Smith T and Sheridan A. 2006. Organisational careers versus boundaryless careers: Insights from the accounting profession. J. Manag. Organ.;12 (3):223-234. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1833367200003977
• Solomon SL and Oliver KB. 2014. Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States: stepping back from the brink. Am Fam Physician.;89(12):938-941. http://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/threat-report-2013/index.html .Accessed August 7,2019
• Soto RG, Chu LF, Goldman JM, Rampil IJ and Ruskin KJ. 2006. Communication in critical care environments: mobile telephones improve patient care. Anesth. Analg.; 102(2): 535-541. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000194506.79408.79PMid:16428557.
• Spaulding EH. Chemical disinfection of medical and surgical materials. 1968. In: Lawrence C, Block SS, editors. Disinfection, Sterilization, and Preservation. Lea & Febiger; Philadelphia, PA: 517-531
• Sprague L. 2009. Health care-associated infections: is there an end in sight? Issue Brief George Wash Univ Natl Health Policy Forum.; 13(830):1-14.
• Tagoe DN, Gyande VK, and Ansah EO. 2011. Bacterial Contamination of mobile phones- when your mobile phone could transmit more than just a call. Webmed central Microbiology.; 2(10). https://doi.org/10.9754/journal.wmc.2011.002294
• Tekerekoǧlu MS, Duman Y, Serindağ A, Cuǧlan SS, Kaysadu H, Tunc E and Yakupogullari Y. 2011. Do mobile phones of patients, companions and visitors carry multidrug-resistant hospital pathogens?. Am. J. Infect. Control.; 39(5): 379- 381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2010.10.026
• Trivedi HR, Desai KJ, Trivedi LP, Malek SS and Javdekar TB. 2011. Role of mobile phone in spreading hospital acquired infection: a study in different group of health care workers. Natl. J. Integr. Res. Med.; 2(3): 61-6. http://worldcat.org/issn/22309969 Accessed September 5, 2019.
